Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 10th Jul 2006 22:44 UTC
Permalink for comment 141763
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 21:46 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-12-14
Take a look at http://www.cs.utk.edu/~shuford/terminal/engelbart_mouse_alternative...
which contains a copy of an email from Doug Engelbart - inventor of the mouse. In the brief note he comments on other methods they considered, including eye tracking.
Ever since then people have considered eye tracking as a pointer controller, but its mostly easier to use your hand.
Commercial eye tracking mice have been available for sometime, having been developed in various places to allow people with disabilities easier use of a compter. Take a look at http://www.eyetechds.com/ for example.
As for the Canon stuff they made SLRs with eye tracking for focus control sometime ago, then gave up becuase it didn't work. Their first attempt at a video camera with eye driven focusing wasn't much better either, to quote from http://www.diku.dk/~panic/eyegaze/node22.html During normal use the video camera can all of a sudden fail to track the eye properly, which forces the user to make sudden movements with the eyes to regain correct tracking. A white square is constantly displaying where the user is looking. We think this must be a very annoying feature, since you cannot avoid looking at this "fly" hovering in front of your eyes all the time.