Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th Jul 2006 12:07 UTC
Permalink for comment 142073
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-04
"Keep in mind that this has happened in roughly 1/2 the time microsoft has had to make a desktop and I would say Linux is on par or better than Microsoft in most every way minus hardware support."
You make it sound like Linux has seen more advancement than Windows. I'd say that the progress Windows made from Win3.0 to WinXP dwarfs the progress Linux made during the same time period. Meaning, the difference between XP and Win30 is much greater than the difference between today's Linux and that of the early 90's.