Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th Jul 2006 17:14 UTC, submitted by alcibiades
Permalink for comment 142097
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
I've got the same make/model: stop, you're making me nervous.
On a related note, this may be a problem with one particular supplier as opposed to a problem with the entire Powermac line. For example, we run Dell Optiplexes at the office. Two particular models (the GX260 and GX270) had particularly horrible failure rates for us. Well over 30%. Turns out that most of the parts effected (the 260 had a bad hard drive, the 270 had bad mobos) were typically from the same 'batch' for a particular supplier. The problematic 260 hard drives were Maxtors from Malaysia if I remember right. but not all the 260s had hard drives from Malaysia. We just happened to get a high concentration of effected units. So I'm not entirely pissed at Dell for this (they've been real champs about replacement parts), just at their supplier for skimping on the quality control.
This could be the same issue at hand here. I'm not defending Apple (or bashing dell for that matter), just trying to put a perspective on this. It could just be an issue of really bad QC at one particular supplier and not an indictment of the entire powermac line. Just a thought.