Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Jul 2006 21:08 UTC
Microsoft In a Q&A, Neelie Kroes, who fined MS for not complying with the EC's antitrust ruling, said: "I regret that the Commission has had to take such a step today, but given Microsoft's continued non-compliance to date, I have been left with no alternative. Today's decision reflects my determination to ensure that Microsoft complies with its obligations.Microsoft has claimed that its obligations in the decision are not clear, or that the obligations have changed. I cannot accept this characterisation - Microsoft's obligations are clearly outlined in the 2004 decision and have remained constant since then."
Permalink for comment 143223
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Outrageous
by MollyC on Sat 15th Jul 2006 12:40 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Outrageous"
MollyC
Member since:
2006-07-04

Einstein, I'm referring to the above post complaining about WINE having difficulty implementing Windows APIs because Microsoft hasn't publicly documented their internal functions. Demanding that internal functions be documented for public use is dumb.

Reply Parent Score: -2