Linked by Andrew Youll on Sat 6th Aug 2005 08:30 UTC, submitted by tbutler
Qt In a series of articles (part I, part II) during the month of July, OfB's Timothy R. Butler explained why he felt that KDE needed to move beyond the Qt toolkit it uses as a foundation. In that series, he asserted that the licensing of Qt is becoming a stumbling block to the desktop's adoption. Eric Laffoon, the project lead for KDE's Kdewebdev module, takes exception to Butler's arguments and makes the case for his view on the issue of Qt at
Permalink for comment 14432
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
What's the fuss about?
by Mystilleef on Sat 6th Aug 2005 15:44 UTC
Member since:

But why shouldn't they release it under whatever license pleases them? If I spend time, resources and effort to author software, what right do you have to tell me what license to use?

Reply Score: 1