Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 19th Jul 2006 21:18 UTC
Permalink for comment 144924
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-12
It is frequently mandated by telcos and service providers in their specifications for STBs [that the operating system] is open source and the Telco will have access to a system it can work with an modify independently of the hardware manufacturer. In emerging markets without clearly defined standards this is considered essential for future proofing.
If telcos and service providers need to be able to modify the operating system, you can always offer them sourcecode access on a case by case basis. There is absolutely no need to make the whole operating system open source. Customer specifications should not always be taken literally. It is important to ask for the motive behind each specification and understand what the customer wants to achieve.
Of course, if your operating system is offering absolutely no real-world advantage compared to free open source solutions, your best shot is to go open source too and pray for a miracle... But I would think RISC OS is actually better than that. With no private equity available, that probably does not matter however.