Linked by James Ingraham on Mon 24th Jul 2006 11:15 UTC
Permalink for comment 145791
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-03-03
"It may not be the best O.S. for everyone, but it certainly has its place in this world."
For the people that can get in touch with it, yes, maybe. Should I speak also of a revolutionary OS that I keep under cover and only a few (and rich) customers could affor ? I don't think so, because hardly few people will ever have to deal with...
That's the problem with QNX : with 6.0 and 6.1, I thought it was some 'early' versions that lacked features released as NC (Non Commercial) usage to the community as an appeal. Then with 6.2 and 6.3 I understood that QNX don't give a shit about the community and the only interrest is to make money (that's pretty normal).
It's just too sad QNX don't leave some geeks improve the desktop version they don't plan to support anymore.
Kochise