Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Jul 2006 17:32 UTC, submitted by GreatLord
Permalink for comment 146875
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-24
it's a shame that out of the four alloted soc slots, two projects didn't even make it past the midterm evaluation, seems like such a waste of opportunity. great though that the Remote Desktop Client project is doing well.

as for Reactos relevance slipping, I don't really see that happening. since if you are all fired up about Vista, then you aren't really Reactos's target audience.
Maybe I'm a bit retro, but I prefer win2k over XP. Don't need the bells and whistles. rather a stable, fast, low resource operating system that is compatible with windows software and drivers. also, given it being open source, it will allow for greater opportunities in tweaking according to your needs. atleast that's where I hope Reactos is heading. like a win32 equivalent of ArchLinux