Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 2nd Aug 2006 21:08 UTC
Permalink for comment 148621
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-30
Absolutely. Reminds me of this:
"Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away."
Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Although that should probably go with Einstein's famous quote "Make things as simple as possible, but not any simpler"
I really wonder if it would do MS more harm in the long term if they opted to ditch 100% compatibility and use something like the emulation mode now used for dos apps...
I mean, it is pretty obvious that their current development model is not going anyway in the long term...
They really have to come up with a solution to handle the ever growing complexity instead of just piling stuff on top of their aging architecture...