Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 4th Aug 2006 22:50 UTC
Permalink for comment 149419
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-08
"It doesn't matter much anyway because the ATI drivers for Linux suck, so I don't think you would be losing much if you used the open source driver instead."
Are you serious? While one can argue if ATI drivers for linux suck or not (and to what degree), saying that one would not be loosing much by using opensource driver is a -little- over the top.
It's fine for 2d, of course, but forget using anything remotely related to 3d. That is, at least, my experience with opensource radeon driver.
Actually, i've been quite happy with ati drivers. Of course they could be better, and I realize that there's a long way to go until they're on par with Windows drivers but on my hardware (9800pro) all 3d software that i'm using works. Without any stability or display corruption issues.