Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th Aug 2006 19:10 UTC, submitted by Dolphin
Permalink for comment 151532
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-07
Microsoft had introduced a run-time environment that was for the first time a true 'write once, run everywhere' implementation
I call BS and FUD. Java had this years earlier. The only reason that .NET was any different to Java's similar claims is that MSFT limited the scope of the runtime, only releasing it for certain editions of its OS and only its OS, not OSX or other UNIXes. Java is the same way when you focus on the same limitations - any Java 1.2 app will run on any J2SE v1.2 VM. Just don't try running J2EE apps on your cellphone's J2ME VM as they are different platforms and are a world appart.
Then I could get into the whole "well of course .NET works like that, it is based on Java" but nobody else agrees with me on that one so I'll shut up :o)
Damien