"If we want open source software to take off on the desktop, we need to reduce the amount of choice and concentrate our efforts into a single app for each purpose. Choice is one of the drawcards of open source software, but if it is ever to receive adoption at any recognisable level on the desktop, there needs to be less of it. More is less and less is more."More here.
Permalink for comment 154115
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
First off, I don't like KDE and I really wouldn't like anyone telling me that "we'll stop making Gnome and concentrate our efforts on KDE".
And when it comes to package-managers, I don't like yum but I use it anyway because that's what one of the distros i use comes with - it works, but I'd prefer something faster. Pacman is nice, but of course it doesn't handle RPM. Arch is simple, fedora/redhat is more complex - again, different needs...
About HW-recognition. Not sure if you're thinking about the kernel, hal, hotplug or whatever, anyways it's pretty much the same on all distros..
And, btw - I really like the fact that if I don't find an application satisfactory there most likely is anotherone out there for me
Member since:
2006-01-24
First off, I don't like KDE and I really wouldn't like anyone telling me that "we'll stop making Gnome and concentrate our efforts on KDE".
And when it comes to package-managers, I don't like yum but I use it anyway because that's what one of the distros i use comes with - it works, but I'd prefer something faster. Pacman is nice, but of course it doesn't handle RPM. Arch is simple, fedora/redhat is more complex - again, different needs...
About HW-recognition. Not sure if you're thinking about the kernel, hal, hotplug or whatever, anyways it's pretty much the same on all distros..
And, btw - I really like the fact that if I don't find an application satisfactory there most likely is anotherone out there for me
Edited 2006-08-20 07:51