Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 21st Aug 2006 14:19 UTC, submitted by Jane Walker
Permalink for comment 154456
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 19:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 11:43 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-22
The driver thing is worrying me. I understand why Linux distros can’t include closed source drivers, I can see why binary blobs aren’t desirable and why GPL fundis want to preserve GPL etc, etc.
However, I want to use compiz etc. I don’t mind if my Suse, Ubuntu etc doesn’t work out of the box as long as it’s easy to find and install the drives I need, I understand the drivers can’t included as such, but links to where I can get the drivers or instructions to how to add repositories where the drivers can be found would be/is good. Why not a CD full of useful stuff downloaded from the net (like you get with PC mags) included with my boxed set disto?
What bothers me is people being hostile to the hardware companies for producing the closed source drivers, yes I’d rather they open sourced them, but I’m thankful they produce Linux drivers at all. It would be much worse without any for e.g. 3D drivers. If the open source community gives these companies nothing but grief for producing these Linux drivers, they might just stop supporting Linux altogether – I don’t want to use the nv or vesa drivers, and I don’t think I’m alone.