Linked by Kroc on Thu 24th Aug 2006 20:26 UTC
Permalink for comment 155968
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-27
I suppose GEOS is considered a small OS, by those still using it today. However I'd consider it a "Failed", "Struggling", or "Abandoned" Commercial OS. I propose that TriangleOS, StormOS, ZotOS, Unununium, UnOS, etc. meet the definition for really small OSes.
Still, I like GEOS as a functional and interesting OS that can run on equipment otherwise only suitable for DOS/Windows 3. I actually have a vintage IBM computer that boots DOS (286? 386?), but don't think I have the Commodore version for my 128D.
-Bob