Linked by Eugenia Loli on Fri 25th Aug 2006 23:55 UTC
Permalink for comment 156122
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-05-25
The problem with Windows are mantaining compatibility with older programs and a gigantic API with lots of duplicated funcionality.
If I were them instead of that virtualization stupidity I would port a very small subset of the API to 64 bits (or replace with a new one if it makes sense) and use the 32 bit subsystem as a compatibility layer with no new features added (and eventually they could run it inside a virtual machine).
I donīt know what they are doing with the 64 bit port but I think they are missing a great oportunity.