Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 27th Aug 2006 09:25 UTC
Permalink for comment 156329
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-20
Yes, Portland is more specific. My aim was just to present the big picture and I wanted to show that the idea of a future single unified desktop is flawn. Portland's motivation is indeed providing ISV's interfaces and tools to enable them to create applications that work well on all desktops. In my car analogy that would represent the standardization efforts and tools that are necessary for companies who either want to provide spare parts or products which enhance the functionality of the car.