Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 31st Aug 2006 22:53 UTC
Permalink for comment 157793
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-08
> IME, this is all hogwash. Programming with threads is not that difficult, after learning some basic principles. Just because somebody somewhere was caught by racing condition or something similar does not justify introducing "new principles".
When "somebody somewhere" translates to "nearly everybody, everywhere" it does.
Just like manual memory management, synchronization is NOT easy and very error-prone in non-trivial programs. And it doesn't scale well, anyway.