Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 10th Sep 2006 20:38 UTC, submitted by fudel
Permalink for comment 161213
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Indeed, it used to be worse. What I really mean is that in the past I don't remember so much hardware being released and upgraded so often. So how could small operating systems keep up? And indeed when I try them I prefer VMware.
As to Apple yes, they have always supported their own hardware. What I mean is that they have called themselves out of "the hardware competition", something that small operating system couldn't do, because I very much doubt people would buy a SkyOS PC, or a Zeta, Haiku or Syllable one.
Edited 2006-09-11 04:20