Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Sep 2006 21:05 UTC, submitted by oferkv
Mac OS X "Apple has brought BSD back into the public eye by making it the foundation of its Darwin operating system, which is in turn the foundation of the OS X software platform. Apple is a strong believer in the orchestral model; Darwin distributions are skinny, reflecting Apple's willingness to make choices among dozens or hundreds of contenders in each functional category. Apple's selections become part of OS X. More than any commercial software platform, OS X is unified, consistent. And soon it will be Unix."
Permalink for comment 164007
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Nit Picks
by Flatland_Spider on Wed 20th Sep 2006 19:50 UTC in reply to "RE: Nit Picks"
Member since:

Ten -- or even five -- years ago, any and every *nix proponent would scoff at using anything but the command line. It's interesting to see how attitudes have changed.

I'm not a traditional *ix person; I grew up with Windows. I have no problem using a command line, but if I have a working GUI then why not take advantage of some of it's niceties. One of those niceties is being able to
browse to a file.

I don't know to what you refer. Darwin is the core of OS X -- it's not going away.

That was my mistake. I confused OpenDarwin shutting down with regular Darwin, and Apple locking their source for a while.

Apple chose to build Darwin on the BSD/Mach hybrid kernel because that's NeXT had already done.

The way I understood it was that NeXT was based on Mach then Apple started loading FreeBSD code on top to modernize it. Yeah, they could have used whatever they wanted to really.

If they had used Linux though they would have had to contribute whatever hacks they did to it back into the source tree, but with BSD they have the ability to do what they want with it. Less legal trouble for them if some code happens to slip into something else.

Reply Parent Score: 1