Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Sep 2006 21:00 UTC, submitted by porcel
GNU, GPL, Open Source David Wheeler does a cross-examination of the GPL and BSD and why the GPL and Linux specifically have managed to attract a larger number of corporate contributors. "If your goal is to get an idea or approach widely used to the largest possible extent, a permissive license like the BSD (or MIT) license has much to offer. If your goal is to have a useful program that stays useful long-term, then a protective license like the LGPL or GPL licenses has much to offer. Protective licenses force the cooperation that is good for everyone in the long term, if a long-term useful project is the goal."
Permalink for comment 164111
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

Sorry I wasn't clear there. I meant more for things like applications, rather than actual kernel improvements etc.

Edited 2006-09-21 01:10

Reply Parent Score: 1