Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Sep 2006 21:38 UTC
Permalink for comment 164859
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-09-01
You think that because you're very young into computing. MS has already destroyed lots of better companies with better products, and the trend is not stopping.
I was thinking the same thing. Some people posting on this are either very young and don't know what the anti-trust trial was about, or they just misunderstood the whole thing.
I don't expect MS to stop turning out products in different markets since they are a software company after all. They just have to play nicer then they did in the past.
You realise this choice is not an easy one ? No you don't. And that's all because of MS and its monopoly.
It's not because of a monopoly. It's because no one has challenged them on key features. Apple could challenge on the desktop, but they're happy with their hardware and ten percent. Linux might be able to challenge in linking desktops, but Active Directory, Exchange, and dime a dozen MCSEs are MS's aces. It's all about the feature set.
Adobe is just worried about getting their monopoly challenged. Nothing to cry about there.
Edited 2006-09-22 19:16