Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 23rd Sep 2006 17:58 UTC, submitted by Ben Jao Ming
Permalink for comment 165341
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-10
Put your IP up for grabs and then every joe, dick and harry can legally appropriate your own IP and use it against you.
I really find that comment hard to swallow. If I put up my code licenced under the GPL, and you take my code and improve it. Then how is that using it against me? Lets remember that you have to allow me to also use your improved code which I can use against you can I not?
So it becomes a battle of who can improve the code the fastest. To me, this benefits everyone, unfortunately, it just doesn't seem to work that way, too many have the not invented here syndrome. And I find it hard to imagine that slime balls like the big proprietary corps don't just take GPL code and lock it up in their closed crap which you'd never know anyway? Or is that what you're talking about?