Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 1st Oct 2006 19:45 UTC, submitted by rx182
Permalink for comment 167396
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-05
Other than the arrogant manner in which these black hats chose to present the exploits. What exactly were they trying to achieve? The problem they chose to highlight seems to be more of a problem with javascript itself. While some browsers may implement javascript better than others, they're still just implemenations of a poorly designed scripting language. I suspect they could've chose from thousands of javascript exploits for any number of web browsers. So, why just Firefox? Does it really have to come down to a clash of cultures?