Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 3rd Oct 2006 18:35 UTC, submitted by anonymous
SCO, Caldera, Unixware Novell appears to be attempting to cut off SCO's lifeline to its cash reserves. By not focusing on the arguments over who owns what in Unix but instead hammering on the far more simple matter of SCO not living up to its business contract, Novell hopes to put a quick end to SCO and its seemingly endless Linux litigation.
Permalink for comment 167919
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Title has it backwards
by sbergman27 on Tue 3rd Oct 2006 21:15 UTC in reply to "RE: Title has it backwards"
Member since:

"""There has been no proof of this given, just hinted at. Don;t be so quick to claim conspiracy."""

Does it really matter if they gathered together in a back room and whispered to each other, or if SCO independently decided to file a frivolous suit against IBM, and MS independently decided to send them $15M in funding to fuel their FUD mongering against what was mutually their greatest potential competitor? (And then referred Baystar to them for even more funding.)

Or do you really believe that MS decided, all of the sudden, thet they needed to send someone $15M for a Unix license, and were so sure that SCO was the proper party to send it to that they just mailed it in without question, so to speak?

The motivations and the end results are the same, whether the cooperation was explicit or implicit.

Reply Parent Score: 5