Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Oct 2006 20:13 UTC, submitted by elsewhere
Permalink for comment 168384
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
Right... I'm all against piracy and I would say that it is a good measure to reduce the functionality of the OS when not activated. BUT as I'm saying there's a big BUT: make it easy for people to activate their copy. Even if they reinstall or whatever just make activation a straigtforward non-obtrusive process. That way loyal customers won't be annoyed and pirates will experience reduced functionaly. But that would only happen in a perfect world tbh so I don't think this would work out okay due to nature of an operating system - you're given access to binaries and we all know that sooner or later it is going to be cracked. So what I'm going for is just make it as easy as possible for the paying clients to be your customers.