Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th Oct 2006 20:49 UTC, submitted by Eugenia
Permalink for comment 169050
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-14
Software repositories scale well enough thanks.
What doesn't scale is updates, given what you say. Try to at least understand what you're saying.
When the desktop becomes more popular, the software authors mae packages for them automatically (if they can, I don't think xvid authors can without risking lawsuits for example).
If you want a latest version then you have no option but to get unofficial packages of compile it yourself. Not exactly easy installation
True enough.
Not exactly the distro's fault. You could complain to the distro or to the software maker.
With Winbacula all I do is install, and many configuration procedures can be automated as part of the installed
So obviously, it's entirely the Bacula authors fault, not the distro's fault at all.
The application developers are in the best position to know when their software is final and works, and if you can provide a good infrastructure in your operating system for making testing, packaging and installing painless, then so much the better
So why they don't do that ? And why do you blame the distro ?
Users being able to install the up to date software that they want is a problem to be solved, not avoided
So why don't you start complaining to Bacula authors ?