Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 9th Oct 2006 17:30 UTC, submitted by JCooper
Permalink for comment 170283
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-06
By the way, whats in Section 13 that PJ censored?
PJ didn't censor it. It was marked in the Groklaw article as "redacted", a court term. Presumably IBM don't want the contents of this made public until they introduce it in court, and have (with the court's consent) had it "redacted". We'll find out - eventually!