Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Oct 2006 15:14 UTC, submitted by Charles A Landemaine
Permalink for comment 170413
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-13
I suppose that, theoretically, the new parent company could close future modifications made to PC-BSD in an attempt to derive a revenue stream, but I don't see the advantage in doing so and I highly doubt that's their intent.
Without knowing more, I can't see where this is a bad thing. BSD, for all it's merits, has lacked commercial backing, development and support on an equivalent scale to linux. On the surface this seems like an attempt really to provide commercial credibility to BSD and provide financial backing while still relying on community involvement for development. I'll refrain from cynicism until it's warranted, and certainly give them the benefit of the doubt here.
Good stuff.