Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 16th Oct 2006 21:08 UTC
Permalink for comment 172275
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
I have to agree with you on this one. Over the last few years I have purchased eight IBM reconditioned units. One purchase was an IBM Thinkpad with a Pentium 150 that replaced a Thinkpad 486 SX25 system. The Pentium 150 is still very happily running Windows 98 to this day.
As for quality design the IBM's are on a par with my G5. They are all easy to work on and so solidly built you could use them for a step stool. The last one I got is an IBM Thinkcenter and that, like the G5, is so easy to work on. You can replace drives and cards with no tools at all. The two M-Pro servers are still chugging away. I got one for a friend and recently gave the other to my oldest son. The latter one had dual P-II 450's in it.