Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 18th Oct 2006 21:54 UTC
Permalink for comment 172965
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-10
Slackware (and Arch nowadays) are the most BSD-like linux distributions.
Much of the author's criticism towards Slackware also applies to the various BSDs. The "BSD way" of doing things.
So, Slackware (and BSD) are not the operating system of choice for those who only want to surf (Firefox), use a word processor (MS Word!), watch a movie and play games. 95% of the population, I presume.
Guess what: I didn't switch to Linux for that!
What about the 5% who hacks, tweaks, breaks, runs experimental configurations, develops?
What about the no frills, gets the job done server?
The average distribution review assumes: newbie seeks desktop distro. Well, to that user I would say: stay away from Slackware (for now).