Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 22nd Oct 2006 22:56 UTC
Permalink for comment 173946
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-27
Anti-virus programs are not a better solution.
I didn't say it was. I'm saying the complete opposite of this, which you'd probably known if you'd bothered to read my other post...
A better solution is to have a good security model for your system in the first place, and then to install only applications for which the source code can be and is inspected and auditable by independent people who have the same interest as you (ie, they are not being paid by the vendors of the programs, and they are end users of the programs themselves).
That's a terrible solution. It's impossible to catch all the bugs. The best security policy is that of containment, not perfection.