Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 24th Oct 2006 20:59 UTC
Permalink for comment 175086
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-25
symantec has been saying the same thing for year, the same old argument has been said for years.
"No one has created a virus for the mac because of it's small market share"
Office was a small market share compared with the number of windows installed pc's, but that didn't stop virus writers not taking advantage of it.
SQL server has had virus's written for it and that has a small market share.
The market share doesn't matter at all for virus creators, what virus created wouldn't want to be the sole creator of a market with no antivirus protection with millions of connected machines.
If it could be done by now it would have been. Now i like all operating systems windows etc.. but it's quite plain that unix and it's dervertives (Mac OSX and Linux) are secure by design, and it is this design which has kept the mass proliferation of viruses.