Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 28th Oct 2006 08:06 UTC, submitted by anonGPLv3supporter
Permalink for comment 176252
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-09-21
... because I think that this idea may be considered old fashioned: but what ever happened to an OS being an OS?
An OS is there to provide services to developers to make great software, to allow software to share resources, and stuff like that. Yet many of the reviews that I have been seeing as of late focus on things like installers, or the bundled applications, or the eye candy, or how "modern" everything is.
And if you are only interested in a user-visible feature list, of course an OS like Slackware or NetBSD is going to look bad. Some OSes are not about mimicing Windows or Mac OS or Ubuntu. They are about making a better workstation for developers. Or maybe they are about providing a stable base for servers. Or maybe they are about satisfying needs that we are not even aware of.