Linked by Eugenia Loli on Wed 1st Nov 2006 02:49 UTC
Permalink for comment 177594
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-10-11
hashnet: Type inference is great on paper and makes for terseness, granted. However terseness is good for writing programs, not so much for reading code.
Mandatory parameter types serves as documentation.
By any means, you should declare your types. The fun part is that Haskell actually does that for you. Load GHC in interpreter mode and enter :t myFunction, copy the type declaration and paste it into your source. Then, i really suggest that you use inline code and comment to your hearts content.