Linked by Kostis Kapelonis on Thu 2nd Nov 2006 10:21 UTC
Features, Office While the capabilities of operating systems have improved over the last years, the improvements have largely focused on under the hood changes. New functionality is reaching the user via additional applications which allow her to write a DVD, connect to her mp3 player, download streaming video locally and other tasks which were not present before. But the graphical interface of the computer itself is keeping the same concepts introduced with its appearance. One could argue that the graphical environment of computers is exactly the same for the last 10 years and only cosmetic changes take place in newer versions of operating systems. Moving away from the desktop metaphor is harder than it seems. Even alternative operating systems have embraced the concept instead of exploring new ideas. This article describes a solution which attempts to free the user from the files/folder concept.
Permalink for comment 177920
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Not practical
by falemagn on Thu 2nd Nov 2006 13:34 UTC in reply to "Not practical"
falemagn
Member since:
2005-07-06

> You go out for a long weekend and take 200 photos
> on your digi cam. You then connect your camera and
> then start uploading, and then, holy crap, you have
> to enter meta tags for 200 photos!

That's the first thing that crossed to my mind too, but then I realized I wasn't taking everything into account. For one, there could be the option to tag a group of files all together, just like you're going to dump them all inside of one single directory whose name you had to, obviously, chose.

Except, you can give more than one tag to this bunch of pictures, whilst with the directory you're stuck with only one name.

It's obviously a more powerful approach and not necessarily more difficult to handle. The directory approach could be shown to be a subset of the database approach, in fact, where each directory is basically a specific view on the db.

Reply Parent Score: 3