Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Nov 2006 22:05 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Permalink for comment 178287
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-11
//I mean Novell cannot possibly make use of MS patented intelectual property without committing it upstream as stated under the GPL. //
Novell's SuSe Linux Enterprise 10 (commonly referred to as SLED) already contains some proprietary applications.
This is what Microsoft refer to as "mixed source". Novell are perfectly at liberty to "make use of MS patented intelectual property" within those proprietary parts of SLED.
http://www.novell.com/products/desktop/
The non-proprietary parts of SuSe Linux are distributed as OpenSuSe.
http://en.opensuse.org/Welcome_to_openSUSE.org
This is GPL code. Novell aren't at liberty to include MS patented code in that, because it isn't Novell's code to begin with. This part of SuSe must necessarily remain under the GPL.