Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 4th Nov 2006 21:39 UTC
Permalink for comment 178981
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-05
"I cant believe [commonly used word/phrase] is commonly held to mean [commonly held meaning of said word/phrase]. That's incorrect!"
When the hell will they learn that if a word/phrase has a commonly held meaning it is BY DEFINITION correct language. If the rules you attribute to the language say that it is incorrect then it is THOSE RULES that are wrong. Sorry. That's how language works. Get used to it.
"ZOMG. Radar should be all caps and with .'s inbetween. Modem, raid, bears, oh my! The rules should be what I say they are! Stop breaking my rules."
You don't control language. Sorry.
If a linguist hates the way language is adapted to suit the needs of those who use it, they should pick a new career.
(Yes.. I used "they" as a singular gender neutral pronoun. It has that meaning now. Get over it.)