Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 4th Nov 2006 21:56 UTC
Mono Project Some interesting bits of his blog entry in which De Icaza replies to emails he has received concerning the Novell-Microsoft deal: "I do not know of any patents which Mono infringes. (...) Although I did not take part of the actual negotiations, and was only told about this deal less than a week before the announcement, I had been calling for a long time for a collaboration between Microsoft and Open Source and Microsoft and Novell. (...) Similar deals have been done in the past, in 1997 Microsoft signed a similar deal with Apple, and Apple used that agreement and the incoming monies to turn the company around. Sun signed a similar agreement with Microsoft in 2004, which at the time I realized enabled Sun to ship Mono on Solaris (which we already supported at that time)."
Permalink for comment 179036
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: for the rest of OSS world
by santana on Sun 5th Nov 2006 12:22 UTC in reply to "for the rest of OSS world"
santana
Member since:
2006-10-22

"Second, Microsoft will not assert its patents against individual noncommercial open source developers."

Define "noncommercial open source developers". Not a single RedHat employee is "noncommercial open source developer". Any enterprise that will try to make a living from OS is doomed by this wording, except from Novell.

Not to mention that this deal clearly breaks OS community in half; it is OK to work for Novell, but not OK to work for anyone else. Oh, yes, it is OK to work as a hobbyist. Just can't make a living out of it. I really don't know how they mean to enforce that. Is Linus commercial or noncommercial OS developer? Alan Cox? Guys from IBM? Terrasoft? Mandriva? Guys from Oracle?

This deal sucks, there's not a single good point in it, no matter how hard you try. What the hell do you think MS gave money for?

The worst part of a deal is that somehow Linux actually sneeked in it. FAQ clearly says Mono, OpenOffice, OpenXML, .Net and such. It doesn't mention Linux per se. However, the deal sucked up Linux plus all of the open source. Is Classpath part of this deal? Harmony? Apache? SugarCRM? Azerus? KDE? Who the hell gave Novell authority to include such broad wording in this deal and explanations of it?

Reply Parent Score: 5