Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 6th Nov 2006 18:26 UTC
Permalink for comment 179536
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-14
It actually just occured to me that we have not yet heard anything from RMS of the FSF on this and they could be the ones that have the power to put an end to this craziness
Wrong ! Eben Moglen already said sth about this. But the worry will come when the GPL is violated, not before.
The GPLv3 already has some verbage in it to protect against this sort of patent extortion
The GPLv2 too, but it's more implicit. It works the same as GPLv3 in the USA, but we're not sure it works as well elsewhere, which is why it is explicit in GPLv3.
they could then immediately send cease and desist letters for all the GNU software in SUSE that's licensed as "GPLv2 or later"
They can't do that until there's an actual violation. FUD is not a license violation.