Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Nov 2006 22:56 UTC
Permalink for comment 179794
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-07
They can still sue each other and as they said no licenses were transfered
So in the phrase "covenant not to sue", the words "covenant" and "sue" are relevant but the word "not" is not? Not.
Funny, by saying I cut the words out, you've cut the words out.
http://www.novell.com/linux/microsoft/faq_opensource.html
Read Q5.
They said they both bought only "covenant not to sue others customers"
You're pretty quick on jumping the gun.
Since Novell clearly made this deal for their own benefit (which is their right), if MS were to sue some Linux company, Novell would plainly stand by, since MS has made it quite clear that it retains the right to sue other parties over things which it has promised NOT to sue novell over. Or do you really think that MS would sue RH, Novell would sue MS, and then MS and Novell would just go back to business?
Good question. But I wonder if it is true. MS never promised it won't sue Novell, MS promised it won't sue Novells customers, which is completely different. And so did Novell. It is customers only related.
I don't get this. OIN holds patents, not licences; if OIN hold them then MS does not have a right to sue over them unless it enters into an arrangement with OIN, not Novell.
You've misunderstanded me here. It wouldn't be MS suing over those patents, I said that other party could still sue MS over them.
Read Q6 in article
Au contraire, it's howling like a wolf. Which is a type of dog
Nope, so far you just wanted to hear them howl. Even if they would meow, you still claim they howled.
At least read the FAQ carefully and then say they howl.