Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Nov 2006 11:24 UTC
Permalink for comment 179965
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-05-14
Does anyone know what was decided between SCO and Novell? The proceeding seemed very scary, because the argument (Between SCO and Novell) basically came down to saying "Novell owns Linux (Unix?), not SCO. Novell did not transfer ownership of Linux (Unix?) over to SCO"
Is this were the argument was left? Anyone know of a site that explains what happened? Was there some resolution pointing out that Novell cant pull a SCO and charge fees for linux usage in some distant (or near) future....