Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Nov 2006 11:24 UTC
Permalink for comment 180042
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-13
the gpl grants you that if the software is distributed, is covered by some patent, it must be licensed for ALL to freely use, or not at all.
I think that is the real confusion here for most people, the patent issue.
As of right now I know of no court case involving patent IP in linux. Its all speculation until a court case takes place.
Novell and MS can make agreements about not suing each other all day long, that has nothing to do with Linux or the GPL until its proven in a court of law that a patent is actually infringed by linux.
Thats my take on the situation anyway
Edited 2006-11-08 17:14