Linked by Eugenia Loli on Mon 13th Nov 2006 03:17 UTC, submitted by samyem
Permalink for comment 181771
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-11-13
I wouldn't turn back. When I evaluated a database engine for a medium size financial website three years ago, I came upon Firebird. I have experience and manage very large traffic sites that use mysql or Oracle, but I wanted open source, and I needed views, stored procedures and triggers (in the day of mysql 4). Firebird provided all that and much much more. As added bonus, Firebird's stored procedure language is quite similar to Oracle, rendering a hypothetical future migration reasonably easy. I am extremely impressed with Firebird's features, performance and stability. I would only take the mysql road for a very high-volume mostly read-only application.