Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 13th Nov 2006 22:21 UTC
Permalink for comment 182122
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-09-30
Are *you* kidding ?
There is absolutely no reason for contracts to be discussed on the public place. Would you ask microsoft to give you a copy of their contract with SCO and others ? They do their best already to hide the bad OEM contracts... Only when they want advertising do they talk about how they owned Novell.
Likewise there is no reason for yT/MS to advertise this. Be sure Palm do know about this (wish I could tell how much they tried to stale it despite being bound). All this is just FUD by clueless ppl.