Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 13th Nov 2006 22:23 UTC
Permalink for comment 182154
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-25
Windows XP x64 is nothing special, it runs at the same speed for most applications, and requires more memory than XP x32. The driver support is terrible.
Ive tried to use x64 a number of times and it's alway's been the biggest PITA for no reward, if you have 3GB RAM > then i can see how it might be handy however 2GB < x32 is fine.
I agree that Windows 2003 is the best Windows OS so far, it runs very fast, has a number of handy features VSS and R2 makes Win2k3 even better (R2 != Win2k3 with SP1/2) as there are many new features in R2 (folder quota's at last).