Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 18th Nov 2006 18:23 UTC, submitted by editingwhiz
Permalink for comment 183842
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-15
My opinion regarding this topic, is that Linux is not The Only alternative for a FOSS operating system.
In future, and right now, there should be a choice of OS for the actual goal you need to achieve. If your goal is having a server, then linux is the choice. If your goal is having a desktop PC, then one must think.
And think about other operating systems, which are also free and opensource.
E.g. ReactOS targets exactly this area - desktop usage, and it already has a solution for the most important 2 problems:
1) Drivers - all hardware manufacturers provide drivers "for Windows" which can be used in ReactOS
2) Applications - number of available Win32 applications is a lot wider than the amount of non-win32 apps (and yes, there exist foss win32 apps too - what a surprise!)
If people would not be that blind to not see anything except linux, ReactOS would evolve much faster than it is evolving now.