Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 22nd Nov 2006 22:50 UTC
Games Ars reviews the PlayStation 3 personal computer game console, and they say: "The PS3 doesn't have any grand ideas; Sony wanted something high-tech, so they started from scratch with the processor and GPU, but what does it get them? Very little so far. The controller is a mash-up of ideas from their old systems, the 360's triggers, and the Wii's motion-sensing capabilities, but once it has that tech it doesn't really know what to do with it. The Blu-ray adds cost, but adds very little to the gaming experience for the user. It's great as a media player, but for those of us who love games first and foremost, we have to look at it skeptically. The PS3 is a system with no core message, and that is what keeps it from being elegant. Will it do great things in the future? I hope so, the possibility and potential are certainly there. For now, it's power looking for a mission statement."
Permalink for comment 184640
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
What does xbox have that ps3 doesn't
by airwedge1 on Thu 23rd Nov 2006 00:58 UTC
Member since:

The way I see it there is not anything that xbox has that the ps3 doesn't, and there are several features that the ps3 has that the xbox does not.

So logic dictates that the ps3 is superior.

I am willing to overlook a few (minor in my opinion) bugs.

Reply Score: 2