
Ars
reviews the PlayStation 3 personal computer game console, and they say:
"The PS3 doesn't have any grand ideas; Sony wanted something high-tech, so they started from scratch with the processor and GPU, but what does it get them? Very little so far. The controller is a mash-up of ideas from their old systems, the 360's triggers, and the Wii's motion-sensing capabilities, but once it has that tech it doesn't really know what to do with it. The Blu-ray adds cost, but adds very little to the gaming experience for the user. It's great as a media player, but for those of us who love games first and foremost, we have to look at it skeptically. The PS3 is a system with no core message, and that is what keeps it from being elegant. Will it do great things in the future? I hope so, the possibility and potential are certainly there. For now, it's power looking for a mission statement."
Member since:
2006-05-12
"The 360 is estimated to be loosing about 50-100$ per console at this point, with further cost cuts inline in 2007 to bring it to profit per console"
Actually, I think the more recent figures from iSuppli say the cost of the Xbox 360 premium system is in the ballpark of $323 leaving them with ~$75 of profit per console (source: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061116-8239.html)
There are no numbers for the core 360, and the same article says the PS3 takes a loss of $306 for the basic model and $241 for the premium system.
Not surprisingly, MS seems to have gotten it right the second time around.