Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Nov 2006 23:05 UTC, submitted by SEJeff
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu Mark Shuttleworth is trying to entice OpenSUSE developers to join Ubuntu. "Novell's decision to go to great lengths to circumvent the patent framework clearly articulated in the GPL has sent shockwaves through the community. If you are an OpenSUSE developer who is concerned about the long term consequences of this pact, you may be interested in some of the events happening next week as part of the Ubuntu Open Week."
Permalink for comment 185364
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: GPL software users
by dylansmrjones on Sat 25th Nov 2006 19:25 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: GPL software users"
Member since:

"Hey, they just put bittorrent links of Windows Vista ! they aren't distributing it, i swear! it's just Links"

It depends whether I link to the bittorrent files directly or only links to a site with bittorrent links. The latter one is perfectly legal in Denmark, while the first one (deep linking) is unclear. Sometimes people are convicted, but not always.

You won't go very far with this kind of defense. Don't try to circumvent the GPL. Putting this on the install CD and automagically installing it without having the user doing it all by himself is clearly illegal.

Nope, it is not illegal. Circumventing a license is not illegal per se. Putting non-GPL'ed code on a CD with GPL'ed code is perfectly legal, as long as the non-GPL'ed code doesn't link to the GPL'ed code. And since the .zip'ed driver doesn't link to anything it is perfectly legal to distribute and perform automatic unpacking and installation. It is clearly within the word of the GPL even if it is outside the spirit of the GPL (and it clearly is outside the spirit - but that is however irrelevant, since the GPL is technically not violated).

The Microsoft EULA and the Apple EULA is mostly void in Denmark according to "Bekendtgørelse af lov om ophavsret - Lbk. nr. 725 af 6. juli 2005".

I can do anything with GPL'ed software as long as I don't distribute. On my own system I can link to anything I want to. The GPL kicks in when I distribute the software. The GPL is _not_ an EULA. It is merely a license and not a license _agreement_.

Distributing the nVidia driver in .zip'ed uninstalled format alongside the GPL'ed Linux kernel is perfectly legal since the linking is happening on _my_ machine. It is unlinked in distributed form and therefore perfectly legal according to the GPL.

As the GPL says in 2. (last paragraph): "In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on the Program with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on a volume of a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other work under the scope of this License."

Distributing the non-installed .zip'ed nVidia driver is merely aggregation of another work not based on the Program on the same medium as the Program.

Reply Parent Score: 1