Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 4th Dec 2006 22:26 UTC
Permalink for comment 188207
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-18
If you look at the patent license for Open XML, it's not so clear-cut. Basically, you are given license for patents that are "necessarily infringed" by a licensed implementation (with further limitations), but does not enumerate neither those nor all patents that pertain to Open XML. So what if you inadvertently infringe on one of those patents that are possible to work around, in Microsoft's opinion, because you don't know what exactly you should work around?